Since the jury has decided, I'm not going to make any commentary except (ah hah!) for one thing: How come they found no trace evidence of her husband's dismemberment in the townhouse? No one is THAT GOOD a housekeeper. Okay, maybe she did chop him up somewhere else, but even a nurse would be squeamish quartering her husband into three different suitcases. Plus, a 115 pound nurse in a fertility clinic knowing how to butcher a 200 pound man?? She's not a surgery nurse, she's practically OBY/GYN. I don't know, I have reasonable doubt. Fortunately for the prosecutors, I was not in the jury pool!
It is amazing how much work goes into prosecutions. The prosecutors had about two days off in the past six months. Kudos to them, if Melanie M. did kill her husband, than the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General succeeded in making a mound of circumstantial evidence take shape in order to convict the nurse. I was laughing when I read the following paragraph concerning the lead prosecutor:
"For the first time since the trial began on March 5, Prezioso was not dressed in black. Asked whether dressing in green was because she had a premonition that the jury would render a guilty verdict on the murder charge, Prezioso said no. "I was behind on my dry-cleaning," she explained." Daily Record, April 24, 2007
She and I have the same attitude concerning office attire. You know you are dressed appropriately when you can attend a funeral after work without having to change. I think we must have been separated at birth!
No comments:
Post a Comment